Treatment refused when we admit not having one, EHPAD dying and 100% mortality in intensive care in the name of science. Science without conscience is only ruin of the soul, negation of science and humanity.
I hear professors, doctors and pharmacists who say, sometimes one, sometimes the other that:
1 / “Giving hydroxy-chloroquine to any person will not make it possible to differentiate those who would have survived without this treatment with those who would have benefited from it, especially when 85% would have received it without needing it” . Argument they present as scientific. Today we know that those who arrive in intensive care have almost no chance. The ICU doctors in Italy almost all had 100% mortality, yes I did say 100%. I heard from a Belgian intensive care nurse interviewed today. who admits 100% mortality: “we have not yet been able to save a single patient”. It is recognized that all intensive care managers grope around, communicate with each other to try to find a treatment, without success. If they had found in France, it would be known but radio silence on this absolute mortality! When we do not know what treatment to give before intensive care, and that directing 15% of the contaminated towards the high probability of intensive care where mortality is frightening, it is to condemn to death those who will be intubated for having them confined confined with a paracetamol lollipop to hide the problem by suppressing the fever. So when we want to do a study on hydroxy-Chloroquine in intensive care, where Prof Raoult says that it is too late to do a study under conditions which are not the same as those recommended by the speaker and to compare two effects under different conditions is not scientist! Refuse treatment and when it is known that it is given early to remove the viral load when the patients do not die from this viral load but from a mechanism of self-defense of the organism against the viral load is of l gross ignorance or imbecility or the will to discredit Prof Raoult out of pure ego or because this treatment, too old, does not cost enough. It is true that they will not be accused of death on prescription, or of not assisting people in danger, but may be of murderous scientific ego which is not punishable (the doctor is not required to a result), just like death on lack of prescription, he can take refuge in saying that there is no lack of means when the means is not scientifically recognized. Very comfortable legally, but without conscience. I do not care if everyone who does not go to intensive care will owe it to hydroxy-chloroquine or not when the mortality in intensive care is absolute for other reasons than those that would solve this treatment. But that we will not tell you, as we did not tell you that the FFP2 mask protects alone or that if everyone wears a surgical mask, we will be better protected.
2 / “Giving hydroxy-chloroquine to everyone is dangerous because of the cardiac side effects and only a specialist can do it.” I do not know of general practitioners or specialists who prescribed it when the patient had a cardiac history and yesterday was prescribed massively, without ECG, and if that had killed so many people that would be known. We were doing so easily what would be impossible today? In addition, we even cited three deaths after self-medication but reports do not question this treatment! The same behavior as for masks, lies by omitting information. As for self-medication, it depends only on the pharmacist and the doctor, not on the patient to make it possible: a prescription is needed!
In summary in the name of a science which says that not knowing how to treat, we must do nothing, when doing nothing will lead 15% of young and old patients, in high probability, in intensive care where the outcome is fatal, is a science without conscience. The end of a humanity that believes to evolve through science for egos who make their ignorance, a weapon they say scientific.
And the EHPAD where old people die without a last look from those who have been the goal of their life, is an abomination, the negation of what could be the common thread of our life here below, in the name of confinement fool when the staff who look after them, come in and go out every day and have no protective equipment! That under the cover of the cold science of an imbecile confinement because without protection of the outside by the vector of its own personnel.
You are told that 85% of infected people will get by with paracetamol and that’s true. And for that we will do nothing else when 15% who go to the hospital, will see a large number being intubated, will die there the soles of the feet turned towards the sky with an absolute chance of mortality. Inquire !!!!!!!! When so many die why still prevent them from seeing their family? So that they are not contaminated? Educate yourself, be indignant because science is not there to impose you whatever it is when it admits not knowing.
NB: an advertisement of your government which does not cease appearing on your channels, controlled by all these experts who decide at this moment, says this: “If you cough, if you have a fever, then, you are MAY BE sick “. At home in Belgium to make fun of it, we would say: “It’s to cry with his dick in hand”, when we want to talk about an imbecility which we should laugh but which makes us cry. And then the one who cries while masturbating has little chance of living well and even of achieving his goal. The next announcement will probably tell you: “If you cough and take paracetamol, you are not sick but will die in intensive care.”
The conclusion of the ICU doctors is: “The fact that patients remain confined for so long, that they arrive without treatment and in such poor condition, gives no chance to those we intubate”. Listen better to doctors confronting patients and not those who reflect in an office to make you believe that ignorance of the knowing who do nothing is knowledge; just to mock those who try.
Thank you and courage to the real caregivers.